The Federal AI Use Case Inventory

Forty-one US federal agencies are required to publish what AI they run. They report 3,611 systems. 445 of those are designated high-impact — the designation that triggers an obligation to test the system, assess its effects on people's rights, review it independently, monitor it, and give anyone it decides against a way to appeal. On every one of those safeguards, roughly seven in ten agencies have said nothing at all.

Reported AI systems
3,611
Designated high-impact
445
Agencies reporting
41
With an appeal process
16

Every value here is an agency describing its own systems. This register records what agencies did and did not claim — it is not an audit of what they actually did. A blank safeguard field is published as not stated and never as a “no”: an agency that stayed silent has not denied doing the work, and the distinction is the whole point of publishing the column. Withheld entries (24) are systems an agency declined to detail, mostly citing disclosure risk or law. To dispute or correct an entry, contact us. Built under our data standards.

What the safeguards look like

These eight obligations attach to the 445 high-impact systems. The source is not a yes/no field — agencies answer in their own vocabulary (CAIO Review, Appeal Precluded by Law, Yes – Monitoring Established), so each answer is normalised to a comparable state with the agency's own wording kept alongside in the JSON.

SafeguardEstablishedIn progressNot applicableNot statedSilent
Pre-deployment testing458231871.5%
Impact assessment379131771.2%
Independent review379031871.5%
Ongoing monitoring408731871.5%
Operator training458231871.5%
Human failsafe37811031771.2%
Appeal process16783431771.2%
Public consultation478131771.2%

Read the appeal row first. Of 445 systems designated as materially affecting people's rights, 16 report an established way to appeal the decision.

Which agencies

Agencies with at least one high-impact system, by high-impact count. The Department of Veterans Affairs reports the most, followed by Justice and Homeland Security. 130 high-impact systems sit in the law enforcement topic area.

AgencyHigh-impactAll reportedWithheld
Department of Veterans Affairs215367
Department of Justice114314
Department of Homeland Security55238
Department of Energy29340
Social Security Administration933
National Credit Union Administration56
Department of Agriculture4162
Department of the Treasury4129
Department of State360
Department of Health and Human Services2447
Environmental Protection Agency2293
National Aeronautics and Space Administration142515

Where it is deployed

Topic areaSystems
Science758
Admin Functions424
IT394
Law Enforcement285
Health and Medical272
Other173
Service Delivery150
Energy and Environment131
Procurement and Finance Mgmt90
Transportation79
Benefits Processing56
Cybersecurity53

Development stage across all 3,611 reported systems: Pre-deployment 1,479 · Deployed 1,040 · Pilot 440 · Retired 314.

Source and method

Published by the US Office of Management and Budget, Office of the Federal CIO, consolidating the inventories each agency must post under EO 13960 Sec. 5; Advancing American AI Act; OMB M-25-21. The register here is rebuilt from OMB's own machine-readable file; the repository is on GitHub.

Licence. US federal government work, public domain under 17 U.S.C. 105 (by authorship — the publisher ships no explicit LICENSE file). Stated plainly because it matters: OMB ships no LICENSE file and the GitHub API reports no licence, so the public-domain basis is federal authorship under 17 U.S.C. 105 rather than an explicit dedication by the publisher.

Personal data. None. The source carried one contaminated column — agency contact addresses, mostly named federal scientists — and it is dropped in full rather than filtered, because it also held a bare personal name with no address at all and a personal consumer address, neither of which a pattern-match would catch. Every remaining field is swept at build time and the build fails closed if anything person-shaped appears. Note that the has_pii field describes whether a system processes personal data; it is a fact about an institution, not about a person.

One counting note. The source designation field has four values, one of which is Presumed High-Impact, but Not High-impact (110 systems). Those are excluded from the 445 count. Any analysis matching on the substring “high-impact” will overcount by exactly that number.

Edition: 2025 consolidated inventory. Rebuilt 2026-08-20. See also the Data Protection and Genetic Privacy registers for what the law permits agencies to do with the data these systems process.